Skip to main content

Wireless Charging iPhones? 9to5 says "Not Yet".

Digitimes has a rumor today that the next generation of iPhone will be charged wirelessly via induction- and that the wireless-charging iPhone will be out this year! 

Considering that we already have wireless sync, this would - in theory - mean that our iPhones were finally, completely, free from cables. 

A completely untethered iPhone!

But not so fast. 9to5Mac says that, despite Digitimes' rumors to the contrary, we shouldn't expect a wireless charging iPhone in 2013. Or in the upcoming generation of iPhone, whenever it gets released. 


As 9to5 notes, 2013 is very, very likely to be an "S" year - and if Apple holds true to form, the iPhone 5S will be a spec bump, rather than a design change. 

We'll get some kind of better camera, and faster processor. We may get a fingerprint reader for entering a passcode/unlock. 

We may even get some kind of NFC, but that seems unlikely - they would have done it by now if that was Apple's plan - probably when introducing Passbook with iOS 6.

I do, however, think that inductive (wireless) charging is likely in 2014 with the iPhone 6, for a couple of reasons. 

Keeping Up With The Joneses

The primary reason - Samsung is going to do it (again, per Digitimes), and there's no way that Apple is going to let such a visible feature go unanswered. If the flagship Galaxy can be charged wirelessly, the iPhone will, too. 

A Major Cross-Sale Opportunity

A secondary reason - Apple will be able to tie wireless charging back to their Macintosh line in a big way. 

The current iPad has a beautiful, minimalist, aluminum one-piece stand. 

That stand looks *exactly* like what an Apple iPhone induction charger would look like. 

Adding an induction charger to the iMac is an obvious decision, and a major, major selling point. 

It would eliminate the one bit of clutter on our iPad desk - the 30-pin and Lightning cables sticking out of the back. It would add a giant bit of functionality to the iMac... without changing the aesthetics one bit

I'd upgrade my iMac today if it could wirelessly charge my iPhone. If I could buy the stand separately, I'd pay quite a bit for it. 

I'd imagine that the vast majority of new iMac purchasers would pay an upcharge to get the wireless induction stand, too. 

Closing the Gap

My favorite reason is that wireless charging would allow Apple to finally close the big hole in the bottom of the phone. 

Granted, this isn't as big of a problem anymore, with the Lightning connector. This is more of a legacy complaint. But that 30-pin hole was just massive, and could really fill up with dust and gunk, which would infiltrate the rest of the phone. 

My 3G used to get dust all the way up on the screen, and it was incredibly annoying. 

I never had that problem with my 4 or 4S, so perhaps that dust issue has been solved. even prior to the Lightning connector making the hole smaller. 

But just for piece of mind - it would be great to have the iPhone  with no holes - or a Lightning port that could be closed. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Not All AirPort Extremes are Created Equal (UPDATED)

I'm looking for a used AirPort Extreme. In all the usual places - eBay, Craigslist.  I'll probably get one this week. Why? It's a long story.  A while back, I picked up an AirPort Express A1084 router on Craigslist, and found that it was incompatible with my AirPort Utility and wireless-n network, even though it looked *identical* to the current model of AirPort Express.  So, I wrote a post on this blog about the different types of AirPort Express routers, noting that if you're looking for used Airport Express routers to extend your AirPlay network, you'd better seek out model A1264. In the months that followed, Apple updated the AirPort Express again, changing the form factor (it looks like a little white AppleTV now), adding simultaneous dual-band support, and giving it model number A1392.  ASIDE: I'm not totally convinced that the form-factor change was an improvement. The A1264 plugged directly into the wall, which was incr

Review - WOW Ultra TV vs. DirecTV HR34 Genie

Here in the Chicago suburbs, we had two options for whole-home DVR services. We initially went with WOW Ultra TV, and after about 4 months, we switched to DirecTV's HR34 Genie system. (Neither Verizon FIOS nor AT&T UVerse were available in our area, so we can't review those. I haven't used Dish's Hopper, either. This is a straight compare/contrast review of WOW vs. DirecTV.) Both Ultra TV and Genie have their plusses and minuses. Both offer 1080p output, but that's primarily for the menus, as most TV content is provided at lower resolutions.  Both systems have a similar design architecture - a central hub, with multiple tuners and a large hard drive, recording and storing all TV shows, and distributing them to televisions around the house upon request.  Both systems also bring a number of "add-on" apps and have ways of accessing "on demand" content.  We've had each system for enough time to really put them through

Review: NuCore Flooring from Floor & Decor

This NuCore flooring review will also function as a Basement Update: We're finally, officially moving forward on the Phase 2 finish work.